isu mnggu ini: seorang wartawan majalah insider, telah menyiarkan mengenai pegawai kanan BTN yg bersikap racist dan dikatakan mengeluarkan kenyataan "si cepet dan si botol'. Pegawai BTN berkenaan juga mengatakan bahawa adalah menjadi hak melayu utk memerintah dan menyeru semua bersatu mempertahankannya dlm sebuah persidangan parti politik.
comment DR: bersempena dgn TOK oral for next week, i think this sort of suitable for my real life situation. berkenaan isu diatas, pergerakan parti politik tersebut mendakwa wartawan tersebut yg menyamar sbg seorang ahli puteri?? sbg kurang ajar!!! why they think that reporter as rude??
as a journalist, they need to give the informations to the readers.and the hot story like this, mmg something yg dicari2. journalist have their own responsibility, and it is their responsible to tell such story. adakah wartawan menyamar itu menjadi satu tindakan yg salah?? and adakah she do something that ethically wrong or ethically right?? for sure she did that for her duty. as a reporters the professionalism and responsibility are the main thing that need to be consider. we can see at a different perspective whether she is right or wrong as a journalist...to me, she just want get the truth...and how does she want to get the truth except to undercover? BTN issues before this become a national issue. many have alleged that BTN is racist...but the government tend to denied it. and many mainstream media dont want to find whether that allegation is true or false. while UTUSAN MALAYSIA, which owned by UMNO secara berulang kali menyiarkan positive report about BTN. Then when this story come out, baru sume nk gelabah?? if BTN is not racist, not pro government and not the badan yg wash brain peoples mind, how come those words can come out from senior officer of BTN?
if that reporter does not publish that story even though she knew the truth things, is she an ethical person?? and is she follow the professionalism of reporters.
on the other hand, as a multi racial country, those story just can cause chaos rather than good. BTN mmg diketahui secara popularnye biased and racist without be dikecoh2. jadi what the motiif of that journalist to publish this. any hot story like this only make perbalahan antara kaum. then, we will looking on the reasoning rather than emotion. to publish such this we must to see the consequences after that. I think that reporter only make her decision with emotion only as persidangan tersebut adalah tertutup dan reporter dilarang masuk. mcm lah kalo org cina and india wat persidangan x kutuk2 melayu?? ataw membuat kenyataan racist?? so its unfair to relate the senior officer of BTN with BTN as maybe he tend to give such comment as a MALAYS not as BTN side. besides, with the publish of this story...it only make bad perception to non-malays and will cause more race problems after this. when we need to choose the public safety or the public freedon, the public safety will always win.
Conclusion: to get the truth is a right and to give the truth is responsibility. and are that journalist responsible with her news??
comment DR: bersempena dgn TOK oral for next week, i think this sort of suitable for my real life situation. berkenaan isu diatas, pergerakan parti politik tersebut mendakwa wartawan tersebut yg menyamar sbg seorang ahli puteri?? sbg kurang ajar!!! why they think that reporter as rude??
as a journalist, they need to give the informations to the readers.and the hot story like this, mmg something yg dicari2. journalist have their own responsibility, and it is their responsible to tell such story. adakah wartawan menyamar itu menjadi satu tindakan yg salah?? and adakah she do something that ethically wrong or ethically right?? for sure she did that for her duty. as a reporters the professionalism and responsibility are the main thing that need to be consider. we can see at a different perspective whether she is right or wrong as a journalist...to me, she just want get the truth...and how does she want to get the truth except to undercover? BTN issues before this become a national issue. many have alleged that BTN is racist...but the government tend to denied it. and many mainstream media dont want to find whether that allegation is true or false. while UTUSAN MALAYSIA, which owned by UMNO secara berulang kali menyiarkan positive report about BTN. Then when this story come out, baru sume nk gelabah?? if BTN is not racist, not pro government and not the badan yg wash brain peoples mind, how come those words can come out from senior officer of BTN?
if that reporter does not publish that story even though she knew the truth things, is she an ethical person?? and is she follow the professionalism of reporters.
on the other hand, as a multi racial country, those story just can cause chaos rather than good. BTN mmg diketahui secara popularnye biased and racist without be dikecoh2. jadi what the motiif of that journalist to publish this. any hot story like this only make perbalahan antara kaum. then, we will looking on the reasoning rather than emotion. to publish such this we must to see the consequences after that. I think that reporter only make her decision with emotion only as persidangan tersebut adalah tertutup dan reporter dilarang masuk. mcm lah kalo org cina and india wat persidangan x kutuk2 melayu?? ataw membuat kenyataan racist?? so its unfair to relate the senior officer of BTN with BTN as maybe he tend to give such comment as a MALAYS not as BTN side. besides, with the publish of this story...it only make bad perception to non-malays and will cause more race problems after this. when we need to choose the public safety or the public freedon, the public safety will always win.
Conclusion: to get the truth is a right and to give the truth is responsibility. and are that journalist responsible with her news??
0 comments:
Post a Comment